Modern medicine is NOT Scientific.
This is a pretty bold claim because most doctors and people take
it as fact that medicine is very scientific.
Again, I am picking on the medical symptoms and disease care approach.
Emergency medicine is great. They are actually scientific. I
really want to make clear here again the difference between
emergency type care, and symptoms and disease type care. Modern
medicine and their disease and symptom treatment get a halo
because Emergency care people save tons of lives. The two totally
different, and completely separate sides of medicine, do things
To show you how medicine is the farthest thing from scientific, I
have to first share with you, what scientific is. But donít
worry. As I promised in the beginning, this will be fun, unlike
most science classes you probably took, unless you had a good
I am showing you how medicine is non-scientific, because that is
their biggest argument about how medicine works and how great
it is, and natural health care doesnít work. How them supposedly
being scientific is in part where they get this magical veil
of protection they currently have.
In showing you this, I am also going to prove that natural health
care is actually more scientific than medicine. Using medicineís
own proof, I will prove that Natural Health Care actually works
better and is more scientific than medicine.
How science works, which medicine claims to be a part of, is like
1.†† Science† comes up with a hypothesis (fancy word for
educated guess about how something works) based on current ways
2.†† They attempt to prove or disprove the hypothesis.
They do this by setting up tests, and creating new ways to best
measure the test and if it worked or not
3.†† If the hypothesis is proved wrong once, science looks
for a new hypotheses.
They may use the current hypothesis, until they find a better
one, but science knows it is not true and has flaws
That is essentially how science works.
Medicine, on the other hand, doesnít use that method. They do this:
1.†† Medicine comes up with a hypothesis based on old ways
2.†† Then they accept the hypothesis as true, until the majority
proves it wrong. And the majority can be hundreds, if not thousands
of times versus the one time proof of science.
3.†† When things are finally proven wrong by majority, often
70 years or more later, they finally change their theory a bit
so it is not so wrong.
4.†† They expect everyone else to prove a new hypothesis
by using medicineís measurement tools that worked best for medicine†
start with the First one.
Coming up with theories based on current ways of thinking. Medicine comes up with theories
based on old ways of thinking.
Modern medicine still views the human body as a machine. They still
see the body as a bunch of separate, independent systems, that
if you can find out enough information about the individual
parts, then you can understand the whole. If they can just figure
out how to fix the parts, then they will be able to help people
This is called Newtonian physics, where the sum of the parts can
be broken down, and studied to understand the whole. It works
great with clocks and machines, but not so well with humans.
Because humans are more than a machine with
no internal intelligence.
Through the early 1900ís, in science, Newtonian physics was slowly
being replaced by quantum physics. And in 1927, it was pretty
much complete. Quantum physics was the new understanding in
the science of the future.
The basic principle of quantum physics is real easy; the whole is
MORE than the sum of the parts. That 1+1 = more than 2. This
is essentially what quantum physics says.
This is the idea of wholistic (yes, with a w), working with the person
as a whole, and not just the parts, because the whole is more
than the parts. On point number 1, natural health care is actually
more scientific then medicine. Natural health care realizes
there is an innate wisdom that runs and controls things. And
that this inner wisdom knows more than all the doctors on the
planet put together. The medical symptoms and disease care system
still views the body as a machine that needs to be fixed. That
is not capable of healing itself.
But did medicine did change their theories in 1927 to reflect this
new understanding? Nope, in fact, they still have not really
changed them today. They still look at the parts of the body,
and try and figure out how to make the parts better, thinking
they will then make the whole better. (Picture me shaking my
head like a parent whose kid still has not learned from the
same mistake, they have been making over and over and over and
When they come up with new ideas and theories of ways to help people,
it is almost always based on Newtonian physics, physics that
was proven wrong over 70 years ago. And anything that was based
on Newtonian physics is also wrong, according to science.
For over 70 years, the AMA, has been holding
onto the theory that the body is a machine, and refusing to
change their theory. And yet, most people know that the body
is more than a machine. It has more to it then just the parts
that make it up. Maybe soon, this will be embraced, because
the evidence is starting to get overwhelming. Even for the AMA.
Accepting the hypothesis as true until the majority proves it wrong.
Medicine holds on to its theories tooth and nail. It fights for them
until the very last minute. Why, I am not really sure, but it
doesnít matter why, they just do. See the above paragraph that
shows, how they refuse to change, not even the first time it
was proven wrong, but 70 years after it was proven wrong. They
still refuse to accept the new reality.
Even when there are hundreds of cases in which their theory has been
proven wrong, they still say things like, yeah, but those are
the exceptions, those are just flukes, those are not true, that
The medical symptoms and disease care system has been doing the same
thing for over 30 years to treat cancer, and still, nothing
is different. There are many treatments that have a better cure
rate than chemo, radiation and/or surgery, but yet, the medical
system holds on. This is another great example of how they refuse
to change. How they want to hold onto their ideas and theories.
How they want to hold on, until the evidence becomes so overwhelming,
that they have to change. This is beginning to happen. People
are finally waking up to the fact there are much better ways
than radiation, surgery, and chemotherapy, to help people with
cancer health, than the same thing that hasnít worked. More
about cancer later.
Let me give you a couple more examples; vitamins, cholesterol, spinal
cord injuries, removing tonsils, and appendixes. For years,
Medicine emphatically stated that vitamins were a waste of money,
you were just getting expensive urine. Vitamins did nothing.
The studies grew. The evidence mounted. They held on to their
theory vitamins are useless. The evidence kept coming in, kept
coming in, and despite the overwhelming evidence that vitamins
actually did make a difference, they still denied that vitamins
were of any benefit. Then, in recent years, they finally had
no choice because if they still tried to stand behind there
position that vitamins were of no use, everyone would have seen
them for the idiots they were, because vitamins are beneficial
for peoplesí health and well being.
Spinal cord injuries: For years the medical profession said nerves
do not regenerate. It was impossible. Once you had nerve damage
that was it. But yet there are all these cases of people healing
from spinal cord injuries. And for the longest time, science
said, that is impossible, that cannot happen. And as the cases
came in, they looked the other way, pretended they did not exist,
instead of looking at how people were doing it, so they could
maybe help others, they fought for their theory, that nerves
cannot and do not regenerate.
Tonsils: Doctors used to do ďtwo for one saleĒ on removing tonsils.
If one kid was going to have his/her tonsils out, then
bring in your other kid and we will do them for free, to help
prevent future problems. Now they donít do that, because they
realized, after years of mounting evidence, that tonsils help
keep people from getting upper respiratory infections, or infections
of the lungs. They also realized that when people had their
tonsils out, they were more likely to get infections in their
lungs, the place the infection went, now that the tonsils where
gone. They realized that the tonsils were like gatekeepers.
They kept the bacteria from going into the lungs. The tonsils
kept the bacteria in the tonsils. Rather than looking at why
the body was not able to take care of the bacteria, they just
removed the tonsils. Because that was what they thought was
the one cause, and one cure. For me, I would much rather have
a sore throat than a lung infection any day.
The same with the appendix. The doctors decided to take out peopleís appendix
left and right, if it even seemed the appendix might only be
inflamed. They knew the appendix didnít really do anything anyway.
Then, as the evidence started pouring in, they finally gave
up their theory that the appendix does nothing. They found the
appendix actually helps fight bacteria. They found that when
you take out the appendix, people were more likely to get colon
For years, the medical profession said that eating cholesterol made
your cholesterol levels high. And finally, under overwhelming
evidence, they are slowly changing their theory. They are recognizing
it is not the eating of cholesterol that makes your levels high,
but the eating of sugar and refined products that makes your
cholesterol high. They are realizing that when people quit eating
carbs and refined products like sugar and flour, their cholesterol
levels went down, within weeks, almost every time. Even though
their idea was just a theory, and all the evidence that has
ever been done proved the exact opposite, they still held on.
I could go on and on, but I think you are getting the picture. They
want to hold on to their theories and be right, rather then
throw out the old theory, and get a new one like science does.
Or at least use it, until a better new one comes along, while
knowing, the old theory was not true. If they did this it would
actually allow the medical symptoms and disease care system
to be open to new ideas, like science. But they donít, they
hold on to their theories until they have to change them.
Finally change only after 70 years and overwhelming evidence.
Science changes right away when something is proven wrong only once.
If it is proven wrong once, it is wrong. Period.
Science knows this, but yet medicine, does not seem to grasp
that idea. For over 70 years, the medical field has been holding
on to their Newtonian based medicine. And since Newtonian physics
was proven wrong, anything that is based on it is also wrong.
Medicine is not a science. It is ideas based on theories that
are wrong. If the ideas they are based on are wrong, how can
medicine be right?
Let me say this another way. Letís say you
have a theory that gravity pushes rocks away from the earth.
You get a bunch of rocks, attach
them all over to a box, and if you are in the box, you will
float up in the air. Now, since the first theory, Ďgravity pushes
rocks upí is wrong, your following idea, that a box with rocks all over it will
be pushed away by gravity, is also wrong.
Science knows this, yet medicine refuses to accept this fact. They
continue to base their ideas on theories that were proven wrong
over 70 years ago.
Proving with the same measuring tool.
This one is my favorite. Iíll tell you a story.
There is a guy who we will call Jack. Jack invents a machine that
can change how comfortable it is to be in a room in your house.
It is called a heater. This heater makes the room more comfortable
to be in, especially during winter. Now Jack wants to measure
how well his machine works, because there are other people claiming
their machine works better. So Jack must invent a tool to measure
how well his machine works. He invents a Thermometer. He measures
the room before he puts his heater in the room, and then after,
and the thermometer proves that his machine made the room more
comfortable. And the thermometer can also show how much better
his heater is at increasing the temperature of the room. Thus
proving how well it works against all other heaters. His measuring
device is great at doing this.
Then there is Jane. She also invents something that makes the room
more comfortable to sit in. It is called a Big Reclining Chair.
Jack invented his machine to make the room more comfortable
to be in as well. So Jack doesnít like this competition, so
he sets out to prove that Janeís device doesnít work. He uses
his measuring tool, because it worked in the past. He measures
the room before the Big Reclining Chair is in the room. Jack
then puts the Big Reclining Chair in the room, puts his thermometer
on the chair, and nothing. His thermometer does nothing. So
he goes around saying, see look, with my measuring tool I proved
your machine does not make the room more comfortable.
Now this is a funny little story, because if you have not guessed,
it is exactly what the medical profession did. They invented
something they said was health care, but actually it is symptoms
and disease care. And they used medicine to treat symptoms and
disease. They invented a study to test how well these medicines
worked. It was called a double blind study. They then expect,
and think, that no matter how, or in what way, people help improve
peoplesí health, you must use ďtheirĒ
measuring tool, to see how well ďyourĒ new thing works.
There are more ways to make a room comfortable than by changing the
temperature. There are also more ways to heal people who have
symptoms than by treating them with medications. If you have
a different theory, you need a different measuring tool. You need an appropriate measuring tool to test your new way of doing
things, or different way of doing things. Science knows this,
but yet medicine is saying their way, the double blind study,
is the only way to measure if a room is more comfortable, the
only way to measure if the person is healthier or not.
Wholistic care uses different ways, based on quantum physics, to
help people heal, not Newtonian physics like medicine uses.
If you are testing new theories, you need new ways of measuring
them. The old ways of measuring do not work any more. Imagine
trying to test modern breakthroughs in Science with equipment
from the 1800ís. That is what medicine is asking people to do,
use this machine from 1890, to see if what you have today works.
Just like the comfort level of a room is more than heat, health care
is more than treating symptoms and disease with medication and
surgery. Medicine is not health care. They are symptoms and
disease care. And if you do anything other than symptoms and
disease care with medicine, you need a different way to measure
what you do.
Yet, medicine thinks everyone should use their measuring tool, because
it worked best for them.
To review Ė Medicine bases theories on 70 year old ideas that are
wrong. They keep the theory till it is proven wrong by majority,
and they expect to use the same measuring tool for everything,
because it worked well in one situation.
Natural health care comes up with a theory, based on modern, proven
theories. They throw the theory out if it doesnít work. Or at
least use it full well knowing it is not true, until something
better comes along. They use the most accurate measuring tool
to see how well what they came up with works.
That sure seems a lot more scientific then medicine. What medicine
is really saying, when they scream and shout scientific is,
did you do exactly what we did? Did you do things like us? Well,
I do NOT want to do things like they are doing. Look at the
results they are getting. Look at the level of health in America. I do not want to do the same
things as they do, because look what it has gotten us. My favorite
definition of insanity is, doing the same thing over and over,
and expecting a different result. Treating
people, over and over again, with the same old theories and
ways of doing things, and expecting a different result.
Expecting people to finally get healthy.
It just isnít working.
One more thing that is really interesting to me. Medicine, when they
are approached with anything that is not accepted by what medicine
is all about. Where is your proof? Where is your study? Is it
Well Medicine, let me ask you the same question. Please, show me
the double blind studies for surgery, all surgeries you do that
are not trauma related. Show me the studies that prove the effectiveness
of them. Please do. This is a challenge. I am asking, the so
called scientific medicine, where are all their studies on surgery?
Where are all their studies, like the ones they want everyone
else to have. Where are their studies on the effectiveness of
surgery? Please, send them to me.
I have actually seen a couple of double blind studies on surgery,
and every one actually proved that NOT doing the surgery, was
either MORE effective, or just as effective as actually doing
the surgery. Yes, cutting people and putting
the marks on the outside, like they did the actual surgery,
was just as effective as actually doing the surgery.
This is what I was talking about earlier how they often do not even
have to do the same studies they require of everyone else. They
automatically get the reasonable and customary, without even
doing the same studies they want everyone else to do. It is
time to make natural health care the reasonable and customary,
and make the medical symptoms and disease care system prove
they are more effective and safer than natural methods. I mean
after all, natural health care has just as many studies as they
Actually, natural health care has more studies that prove how effective
it is. They are case studies. The best measurement tool for
how natural health care adds health back into the body is case
studies. And natural health care has tons and tons of case studies.
That is also why natural health care is actually more validated
than many things the medical symptoms and disease care system
uses. It is just not validated with the faulty measuring tool
of a 100 million dollar double blind study.
What is interesting to me is that every time I pose this challenge
to a traditional medical doctor, I always here something like,
well, you cannot use double blind studies for surgery. Or, you
can just look at the person and know the surgery worked. Or,
you just ask the person how they are doing after surgery to
know if the surgery worked. Or, if they didnít die, the surgery
There are some studies, case studies, of how surgery works. And these
seem to be good enough for surgery, but no other techniques
or ways of healing.
And I always wonder, for some things like surgery, why is it ok not to use a double blind study,
but everyone else in the world must prove what they have with
a double blind study??? Does this make sense to you?
With different ways of doing things, and doing different things,
you need different ways of measuring the results. Science gets
this, and maybe, one day, medicine will as well.
Iíll tell you another story. It is about my Dad. My dad had a watch
given to him for a present after retiring from his job. And
this watch, this watch was the best. It kept perfect time. Day
in and day out, year after year, this watch kept perfect time.
Decades past, and the watch still kept perfect time. Then, the
watch began to slow down. It did not keep perfect time anymore.
So my dad asked around, talked to all his friends, and found the
best watch repairer in the state. The person who everyone said
was the very best.
My dad brought his watch to the watch repairer, and the watch repairer
took a look at his watch. He listened to it, felt it, ran all
the tests he knew how to run on the watch, and came up with
The watch repairer told my dad, he had figured out the problem. The
problem with his watch was that there was an extra piece the
manufacturer of the watch had put into the watch. This piece
was an extra piece, and not really that necessary. If the watch
repairer took this piece out, the watch would work like new
If you are like my dad, you are probably thinking right now, that
is stupid. The watch worked just fine, and now, when you take
out an ďextra pieceĒ the watch is going to work again? Like
new? Crazy. And that is what my Dad
thought, so he took his watch somewhere else. He took it to
another watch repairer. This one specializing in watches that lose time.
My dad thought it was quite interesting, and didnít even know there
was a watch specialist who specialized in watches that lose
time. It seemed kind of interesting, because how many things
could cause the watch to lose time, my dad wondered. It could
be many things, but the watch repairer was the specialist, so
my dad took the watch in to the specialist.
And after a while, this watch repairer said the same thing. There
was an extra piece in the watch, and once it was removed, the
watch would run like new again. And that he would have to set
it every once in a while, but that is it. Hmm, my dad thought.
Two people told him the same thing, so, that must be the problem,
even though it made absolutely no sense what so ever. So, he
agreed to let the specialist take out the extra piece.
When my dad got his watch back, it still didnítí work right. In fact,
it worked even worse. Yes, the seconds that the watch
used to lose each day were not gone, but it didnít tell time
at all anymore. And when my dad asked the watch repair person
about this, the watch repair person said, oh yeah, after we
take out that extra piece, you have to set your watch to the
correct time, every time you want to know what time it is, so
you can know what time it is?
My dad said, what? You are telling me that I have
to look at a clock, set my watch to that other clock that works,
and then look at my watch to tell what time it is? Is that what
you meant by set the watch every once in a while? And the watch
repairer said yes. But look how much easier it is to set the
time now, with that piece gone.
This story really isnít about my dad. I made it up. I made it up
because you are probably saying, that is so stupid. He should
have known the problem was not an extra piece that needed to
be taken out. It worked just fine for years, and then suddenly,
the ďextra pieceĒ that was causing the problems, and taking
it out will fix the problem? How ridiculous. I agree, exactly.
You have a body that worked fine for years, decades. And then one
day, you start noticing it is not working like it used to. You go to the doctor, and the
doctor says you have an extra part, and you need surgery to
remove the extra part. And not to worry, the part isnít necessary.
It was put in by the ďmanufacturerĒ and is really just an extra
part. You go to specialist, because
you want a second opinion, and the specialist says the same
thing. You have an extra part, and you
need surgery to remove the extra part. So you agree, and you
let the doctor take out the extra part. And after when the doctor
is done with the surgery and taking out the part, there are
all these other problems that now show up, that they probably
didnít tell you about, or didnít fully explain.
People who had their tonsils taken out because those were just extra
pieces, now have a greater risk of getting upper respiratory
disease, a more severe problem than sore throats. People
who had their appendix taken out, have a greater chance of getting
colon cancer. Just because we didnít know how important these
parts where, when doctors routinely took them out, doesnít mean
they are not important.
Many doctors see the body as a machine. Like your car is. Now, to
you and me, it is obvious, the body is a lot more than just
a machine like your car. This is important, because if your
car breaks down, it is not going to fix itself,
it is not going to get better without someone fixing it. This
is how most doctors see the body. If it is broken, the only
way to fix the body, is to do something.
That the body cannot heal itself. This is part of the Newtonian
physics that was proven wrong in the 1920ís, and medicine still
uses it as if it were true.
Imagine for a moment, that every night while you slept, a mechanic
came into your garage, and replaced any part that was wearing
down and not working correctly. Every time the fabric of the
seats got a little worn, the mechanic would replace the seats.
When the gauges got dirty, they would be replaced. When the
engine started to wear, and lose some power, the mechanic would
replace the engine. Anytime the tires became worn, the mechanic
would change the tires. The brakes become worn, and the mechanic
would replace the breaks. He did all this in your garage while
you slept. This mechanic knows every hose, every wire, every
computerized part, everything about your car.
Do you think you would ever have to worry about your car breaking
down? No, of course not because when it first started to break
down, the mechanic would replace it.
This is kind of how you can think of the human body. And the mechanic
is the Inner Wisdom. The Inner Wisdom that knows EVERYTHING there is to know about
you, your body, and your mind. Everything.
And every night, your inner wisdom goes to work on healing you
and making you better. This inner wisdom is what quantum physics
shows us as the sum of the parts equal to more than the whole.
All you have to do is make sure the mechanic has everything he needs.
He will tell you what he needs, and you just have to make sure
to do it. This is like your inner knowing. It tells you what
it needs to make you well all the time. But if you donít listen,
if you donít give your body the parts it needs to replace the
broken down parts, your inner wisdom cannot fix you. If the
mechanic doesnít have an extra set of brake pads, he cannot
replace the old worn out ones.
Science understands that just because they donít know how to do something,
doesnít mean it is impossible. They know that current ways of
thinking are always changing. Always being
improved upon. They know that their lack of knowledge
does not make something so. The medical profession seems to
think that if they donít know how to help you, it is impossible.
That if they donít know how to do it, it cannot
be done. They do not stay open to the constant changes
and improvements being made in health care. They hold on to
their old ways, and refuse to change until it is so overwhelming,
they have no choice.
Medical symptoms and disease care is the least scientific group around.
They base their theory on physics principles which were proven
wrong 70 years ago. The medical symptoms and disease care system
thinks everyone else should measure what they do, with the medical
symptoms and disease care measures. No matter how inappropriate
it is. The medical symptoms and disease care system doesnít
have to do double blind studies on surgery and other things.
But everyone else has to do double blind studied on everything
they do. The medical symptoms and disease care system holds
on, fighting for their theories tooth and nail, until the evidence
becomes so overwhelming, they are forced to change. Medicine
is not scientific at all.